Amcan Holdings, Inc. v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce: Appellate Division Distinguishes Enforceable Contracts from Agreements to Agree
Date: 03/22/10
On February 4, 2010, the Appellate Division, First Department, of the Supreme Court of New York issued a decision in Amcan Holdings, Inc. v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce holding that an executed "Summary of Terms and Conditions" setting forth a detailed description of the parties' financing transaction was not an enforceable agreement, but rather merely an agreement to agree dependent on a future definitive agreement.
Amcan Holdings Inc v Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce - Appellate Division Distinguishes Enforceable Contracts from Agreements to Agree.pdf (pdf | 30.89 KB )